Is It Okay to Use AI to “Write”?
The rapid rise of AI-driven language tools and Large Language
Models (LLMs) has reshaped the way we create content. Blogs, newsletters,
speeches, and even books are now increasingly produced with the
help of artificial intelligence. Many authors openly use AI, while others avoid
mentioning it altogether. This naturally raises a crucial question: Is it
acceptable to use AI to write?
The short answer: there is nothing inherently wrong with
using AI, but there is something fundamentally missing if the author depends on
AI to do the writing entirely.
Writing isn’t just about putting words together. It is a
deeply human exercise of thinking, understanding, analysing, and expressing
one’s perspective. When a writer chooses a topic, they carry with them their
experience, emotions, memories, beliefs, research, and intent. These become the
skeleton of the article, its structure, context, background, flow, and message.
AI can be extremely helpful, but it remains a tool. It can
refine language, clarify sentences, simplify jargon, elevate sophistication in
tone, and help with editing. It can save time by expanding bullet points into
sentences or summarising long paragraphs. But when the thinking is outsourced to AI, the outcome lacks depth. There is no personal voice, no
lived experience, and no intellectual journey inside the writing, merely
well-arranged text.
The real danger lies in replacing original thought with
generated content. If the machine decides the angle, emotion, logic, and
messaging, then the author isn’t truly writing, they’re simply publishing. The
article may sound articulate, but it rarely carries the authenticity of human
reasoning and conviction. And, yes, readers can sense this.
A balance is however possible. The author must
first define the subject, purpose, point of view, structure, supporting ideas,
examples, and conclusions. Once the thought framework is in place, AI can
assist in polishing the final draft. In this approach, the writing still
reflects the author’s originality; AI only enhances communication; it doesn’t
replace it.
In conclusion, AI is excellent for grammar checks, language
refinement, and strengthening readability. However, depending on AI to write
the entire article is unlikely to produce meaningful, genuine work. The
thinking must always come from the author; AI can help with the delivery.
No comments:
Post a Comment